Contracts that Affect the Rights or Obligations of Securityholders

CAUTION: Lexata's content was last updated in 2024 and may not reflect current securities regulatory requirements.

Paragraph 12.1(1)(e) of the Instrument requires reporting issuers to file copies of contracts that can reasonably be regarded as materially affecting the rights of their securityholders generally. A warrant indenture is one example of this type of contract. We would expect that contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business would not usually affect the rights of securityholders generally, and so would not have to be filed under this paragraph.

The U.S. and Canadian securities law topics covered by this website are listed on the home page. Please contact us with any questions about the coverage of this website and future topic additions.

In respect of Ontario laws and rules on Lexata’s website: © Queen’s Printer The materials have been reproduced with care but are not the official versions as set forth in The Legislation Act, 2006.

In respect of B.C. laws and rules on Lexata’s website: These materials contain information that has been derived from information originally made available by the Province of British Columbia at: http://www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca and this information is being used in accordance with the King’s Printer Licence – British Columbia, available at: https://www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/standards/Licence.html. They have not, however, been produced in affiliation with, or with the endorsement of, the Province of British Columbia and THESE MATERIALS ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL VERSION.

Reset Password

Thank you for trialing Lexata.

We look forward to working with you.

Already a customer? Please

Back to Login